Merlin Entertainments General Discussion

General theme park and attraction industry chat, along with the world of theme park gaming.
Post Reply
User avatar
davewazere
Member
Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:50 pm
Location: stockport
Contact:

Isnt this ment to be a discussion about improving fastrack?

i think the time slot idea is good but instead of having a slot for each ride have one for the area. dark forest, forbidden valley ect. give people a 2 hour slot for each area (10:00am -12:00pm, 10:15am - 12:15pm ect ect) varying the price according to rides on them. that way people can play their day better around the timeslots and alton could manage the ammount of people queing for them.
[url=http://"http://ridesims.com/users/875-big-dave/"]Image[/url]
User avatar
Islander
Member
Member
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Space Station Mir
Contact:

They are indeed £16 - that's what they were being sold for at Lego.

It feels much more sturdily built than those from the last two years, but for me at least it was every bit as leaky :|
SpinballEdders

Has anyone got a full list of songs from WWTP radio at Thorpe?
User avatar
Rollermad
Member
Member
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:03 pm
Location: North London

Stealth once broke down after I brought the ticket and I had to leave before rush hour so I got the fast track refunded
Image
User avatar
mrbrightside
Member
Member
Posts: 972
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: Norwich

Does anyone here actually fully understand how Merlin Studios works or operates in relation to the theme parks?

I have heard a lot about the company charging hugely inflated prices for basic jobs - which seems stupid considering that the theme parks are a part of the same umbrella corporation...

In my view, Studios should be not for profit - with any profits being invested in the attractions. That or they should run at a small loss with the loss being made up by the attractions. This would surely free up cash to be spent on theming new attractions etc?

I can't be the only one who just doesn't get it xD. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ImageImage
User avatar
BigAl
Member
Member
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:00 am
Location: South East Cheshire
Contact:

I don't know anything about the price of creating theming for the park. I do however know that whatever theming is created should be done as cheaply as possible and without the price affecting the quality of the end product. I know that if I worked there that I'd do everything in my power to create as much theming as possible to make the attractions as immersive as possible. Each new project would be a new lease of life and money wouldn't come into it for me.

I'd love to know more about Merlin Studios. I'd love to work in theming, so this topic is of particular interest to me. :)
User avatar
Adam
Member
Member
Posts: 3965
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: UK

From my past experience when I used to work at the resort...

A good example of how they operate is to use signage. We wanted new signage made, they quoted a ridiculous price! Totally unjust!

In the end, it was much, much cheaper to go to a local professional signage company than doing it through Studios... Which is what we did!

Think that sums it up to be honest...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapa-forum talking-blabbing about stuff app-thing...
"It would be spiteful to put Jellyfish in a trifle..."
AstroDan

Indeed. Often, things aren't done due to costs of anything from Merlin Studios. A basic height board from them is a fortune.

Sent from my HTC Desire HD A9191 using Tapatalk
User avatar
BigAl
Member
Member
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:00 am
Location: South East Cheshire
Contact:

Why though? Surely they'd want to do work for as little as possible to maximise the amount of work that they get from Merlin and to have their work in all of their attractions. Surely that would be a better feeling rather than just stuffing your pockets? Or do they work in a different way to other theming/design companies? :?
User avatar
Johno
Member
Member
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:21 am

Does seem just a little silly...
User avatar
Adam
Member
Member
Posts: 3965
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: UK

The best way to explain it, is that they work as a separate company within Merlin. They work within their own budgets and work for profits.

Why it's like this I don't know. But it's why so many of the little things around the resort go without attention.    Even something as small as a new themed paint job or sign has to be approved for budget. Why do you think Cariba Creek signs still remain..?

If Merlin worked more like Disney with a team of Imagineers and scrap the Studios as it is, it would greatly improve EVERY aspect of the resort and all parks/resorts. Not gonna happen though :(


Sent from my iPhone using Tapa-forum talking-blabbing about stuff app-thing...
"It would be spiteful to put Jellyfish in a trifle..."
User avatar
Sam
Member
Member
Posts: 4869
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 7:18 pm
Location: People's Socialist Republic of Sheffield
Contact:

Can anyone who does business explain why this isn't an absurd way to run a company?

Because to us laymen, it seems utterly bizarre.


Unfortunately I heard they're scrapping most of the theming on Wodan as Roland Studios were charging too much. :(
DiogoJ42

It only makes sense from an accounting viewpoint. The BBC did the same thing years ago, and sold off all their equipment, studios, staff etc to newly created internal companies. They then charge each other for services and the money just keeps moving round in circles within the overall corperation. That way the books look like you are making a profit, and keeps shareholders / fat cat bosses happy... even though in reality you are loosing more money than you did before when you were one big happy family. It's the same logic as making your staff redundant then re-hiring them as freelancers at a higher rate. :no:

It's no surprise that Chessington no longer use Studios, and get external companies to do all their theming work.
Last edited by DiogoJ42 on Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Johno
Member
Member
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:21 am

It just seems a bit silly. All the Merlin attractions need the studios!

Why don't they just charge at cost price + labour. No need for them to make a profit.
User avatar
Benzin
Member
Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: Stafford

BigAl wrote: Why though? Surely they'd want to do work for as little as possible to maximise the amount of work that they get from Merlin and to have their work in all of their attractions. Surely that would be a better feeling rather than just stuffing your pockets? Or do they work in a different way to other theming/design companies? :?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Welcome to the world of business... Of EVERY company...
Image
User avatar
BigAl
Member
Member
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:00 am
Location: South East Cheshire
Contact:

Benzin wrote:
BigAl wrote: Why though? Surely they'd want to do work for as little as possible to maximise the amount of work that they get from Merlin and to have their work in all of their attractions. Surely that would be a better feeling rather than just stuffing your pockets? Or do they work in a different way to other theming/design companies? :?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Welcome to the world of business... Of EVERY company...
I didn't realise that companies needed money. Sorry. :roll:


You do realise that there's a distinct difference between only seeking as much money as possible and earning money whilst building up a reputation and creating attractions to be truly proud of? Remember Tussauds, no?
Last edited by BigAl on Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
CoasterCrazyChris
Member
Member
Posts: 2758
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:31 pm
Location: Bristol

It's always about making money. And why the hell would it not be?

The difference is the approach you take to make it.

Merlin have the wrong approach. Tussauds had a better one.

:)
User avatar
BigAl
Member
Member
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:00 am
Location: South East Cheshire
Contact:

A company quite obviously has to make money to survive and grow, but that shouldn't mean that it affects how you do things to the extent where you're putting people off because you don't want to do things at a reasonable price. What's the point in them if the attractions turn to other places to get things done? They could earn more if they lowered their prices as more of the attractions would be able to afford things. If Merlin Studios wasn't a separate company then the whole discussion regarding money would be out of the equation. As others have said, look at how Disney does things.
Last edited by BigAl on Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DanB
Member
Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:12 am

Sometimes it makes sense for each department in a company to run its own profit & loss account but when other parts of the company avoid it due to high costs then they really do need to change how it is set up.

Here are some costs Merlin Studios charged for Spinball
Q-Line Games - £50,000
Q-Line Audio - £20,000
Q-Line Entrance Feature - £5,500
Thumper Bumpers - £35,000
Q-Line Fence Painting - £8,000
User avatar
Islander
Member
Member
Posts: 2204
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:12 pm
Location: Space Station Mir
Contact:

Bloody Hell, £8k to paint some fence!?! That's properly shocking...
Post Reply